Higgs Boson Could Explain Matter’s Dominance over Antimatter
A new theory suggests the Higgs field varied in the early universe, offering matter a chance to split off from antimatter
February 20, 2015 |By Clara Moskowitz
Computer simulation of particle tracks from an LHC collision that produced a Higgs boson.
CERN
The stars, the planets and you and I could just as easily be made of antimatter as matter, but we are not. Something happened early in the universe’s history to give matter the upper hand, leaving a world of things built from atoms and little trace of the antimatter that was once as plentiful but is rare today. A new theory published February 11 in Physical Review Letters suggests the recently discovered Higgs boson particle may be responsible—more particularly, the Higgs field that is associated with the particle.
The Higgs field is thought to pervade all of space and imbue particles that pass through it with mass, akin to the way liquid dye gives Easter eggs color when they are dunked in. If the Higgs field started off with a very high value in the early universe and decreased to its current lower value over time, it might have briefly differentiated the masses of particles from their antiparticles along the way—an anomaly, because antimatter today is characterized by having the same mass but opposite charge as its matter counterpart. This difference in mass, in turn, could have made matter particles more likely to form than antimatter in the cosmos’ early days, producing the excess of matter we see today. “It is a nice idea that deserves further study,” says physicist Kari Enqvist of the University of Helsinki, who was not involved in the new study but who has also researched the possibility that the Higgs field lowered over time. “There is a very high probability for the Higgs field to have a high initial value after inflation.”
The inflation of the universe
Inflation is a theorized early epoch of the universe in which spacetime rapidly ballooned. “Inflation has a very peculiar property; it allows fields to jump around,” says study leader Alexander Kusenko of the University of California, Los Angeles. During inflation, which radically altered the universe in a span much less than a second, the Higgs field might have hopped from one value to another due to quantum fluctuations and could have gotten stuck at a very high value when inflation ended. From there it would have settled down into its lower “equilibrium” value, but while it was changing its constantly varying value could have given matter particles different masses than their antimatter counterparts. Because lighter particles require less energy to form they arise more often. Thus, if matter was lighter, it could have quickly become more plentiful.
The reason the Higgs field would have had such an easy time of jumping around during inflation is that the measured mass of the Higgs boson, the particle associated with the field, is relatively low. The boson appeared in 2012 inside the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland, revealing its mass to be about 126 GeV (giga-electron volts), or roughly 118 times the mass of the proton.
That is somewhat lighter than it could have been, according to various theories. Think of the Higgs field as a valley between two cliffs. The value of the field is akin to the elevation of the valley, and the mass of the boson determines the slope of the cliff walls. “If you have a very curved valley then you probably have very steep sides,” Kusenko says. “That’s what we discovered. This value tells us that the walls are not very steep—that means the Higgs field could jump around and go very far” to other valleys at higher elevations. Enqvist agrees that the Higgs could very well have started off much higher than it is today. Whether or not this caused the matter to split from antimatter is “somewhat more speculative,” he says.
A new particle
Such splitting would depend on the presence of a theorized particle that has gone undetected so far: a so-called heavy Majorana neutrino. Neutrinos are fundamental particles that come in three flavors (electron, muon and tau). A fourth neutrino might also exist, however, that is expected to be much heavier than the others and thus more difficult to detect (because the heavier a particle is, the more energy a collider must produce to create it). This particle would have the strange virtue of being its own antimatter partner. Instead of a matter and antimatter version of the particle, the matter and antimatter Majorana neutrinos would be one and the same.
This two-faced quality would have made neutrinos into a bridge that allowed matter particles to cross over into antimatter particles and vice versa in the early universe. Quantum laws allow particles to transform into other particles for brief moments of time. Normally they are forbidden from converting between matter and antimatter. But if an antimatter particle, say, an antielectron neutrino turned into a Majorana neutrino, it would cease to know whether it was matter or antimatter and could then just as easily convert to a regular electron neutrino as turn back into its original antielectron neutrino self. And if the neutrino happened to be lighter than the antineutrino back then, because of the varying Higgs field, then the neutrino would have been a more likely outcome—potentially giving matter a leg up on antimatter.
“If true, this would solve a big mystery in particle physics,” says physicist Don Lincoln of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, who was not involved in the study. Yet the Majorana neutrino “is entirely speculative and has eluded discovery, even though the LHC experiments have a vigorous research program looking for it. Researchers will certainly keep this idea in mind as they dig through the new data the LHC will begin generating in the early summer this year.”
The Higgs field is thought to pervade all of space and imbue particles that pass through it with mass, akin to the way liquid dye gives Easter eggs color when they are dunked in. If the Higgs field started off with a very high value in the early universe and decreased to its current lower value over time, it might have briefly differentiated the masses of particles from their antiparticles along the way—an anomaly, because antimatter today is characterized by having the same mass but opposite charge as its matter counterpart. This difference in mass, in turn, could have made matter particles more likely to form than antimatter in the cosmos’ early days, producing the excess of matter we see today. “It is a nice idea that deserves further study,” says physicist Kari Enqvist of the University of Helsinki, who was not involved in the new study but who has also researched the possibility that the Higgs field lowered over time. “There is a very high probability for the Higgs field to have a high initial value after inflation.”
The inflation of the universe
Inflation is a theorized early epoch of the universe in which spacetime rapidly ballooned. “Inflation has a very peculiar property; it allows fields to jump around,” says study leader Alexander Kusenko of the University of California, Los Angeles. During inflation, which radically altered the universe in a span much less than a second, the Higgs field might have hopped from one value to another due to quantum fluctuations and could have gotten stuck at a very high value when inflation ended. From there it would have settled down into its lower “equilibrium” value, but while it was changing its constantly varying value could have given matter particles different masses than their antimatter counterparts. Because lighter particles require less energy to form they arise more often. Thus, if matter was lighter, it could have quickly become more plentiful.
The reason the Higgs field would have had such an easy time of jumping around during inflation is that the measured mass of the Higgs boson, the particle associated with the field, is relatively low. The boson appeared in 2012 inside the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland, revealing its mass to be about 126 GeV (giga-electron volts), or roughly 118 times the mass of the proton.
That is somewhat lighter than it could have been, according to various theories. Think of the Higgs field as a valley between two cliffs. The value of the field is akin to the elevation of the valley, and the mass of the boson determines the slope of the cliff walls. “If you have a very curved valley then you probably have very steep sides,” Kusenko says. “That’s what we discovered. This value tells us that the walls are not very steep—that means the Higgs field could jump around and go very far” to other valleys at higher elevations. Enqvist agrees that the Higgs could very well have started off much higher than it is today. Whether or not this caused the matter to split from antimatter is “somewhat more speculative,” he says.
A new particle
Such splitting would depend on the presence of a theorized particle that has gone undetected so far: a so-called heavy Majorana neutrino. Neutrinos are fundamental particles that come in three flavors (electron, muon and tau). A fourth neutrino might also exist, however, that is expected to be much heavier than the others and thus more difficult to detect (because the heavier a particle is, the more energy a collider must produce to create it). This particle would have the strange virtue of being its own antimatter partner. Instead of a matter and antimatter version of the particle, the matter and antimatter Majorana neutrinos would be one and the same.
This two-faced quality would have made neutrinos into a bridge that allowed matter particles to cross over into antimatter particles and vice versa in the early universe. Quantum laws allow particles to transform into other particles for brief moments of time. Normally they are forbidden from converting between matter and antimatter. But if an antimatter particle, say, an antielectron neutrino turned into a Majorana neutrino, it would cease to know whether it was matter or antimatter and could then just as easily convert to a regular electron neutrino as turn back into its original antielectron neutrino self. And if the neutrino happened to be lighter than the antineutrino back then, because of the varying Higgs field, then the neutrino would have been a more likely outcome—potentially giving matter a leg up on antimatter.
“If true, this would solve a big mystery in particle physics,” says physicist Don Lincoln of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, who was not involved in the study. Yet the Majorana neutrino “is entirely speculative and has eluded discovery, even though the LHC experiments have a vigorous research program looking for it. Researchers will certainly keep this idea in mind as they dig through the new data the LHC will begin generating in the early summer this year.”
No comments:
Post a Comment