Translate AMICOR contents if you like

Showing posts with label CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Lipoprotein(a)

A new drug lowers levels of a protein related to ‘bad’ cholesterol

The next clinical trial will test if the treatment reduces the risk of heart attack and stroke

doctor talking to a patient
Testing for a person’s level of lipoprotein(a), which carries fat and cholesterol, could become widespread if a new drug that can drastically reduce the protein is found to lower the risk of heart attack and stroke.
FATCAMERA/GETTY IMAGES PLUS
Routine blood tests in the not-too-distant future may feature a new line item: lipoprotein(a).
High levels of this fat- and cholesterol-carrying protein increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, research suggests. But there has been little anyone can do about it. How much lipoprotein(a) a person produces is largely locked in by genetics, and the level remains relatively steady throughout life. That’s in contrast to “bad” LDL — low-density lipoprotein — cholesterol, which changes depending on diet and exercise.
Because lipoprotein(a) is genetically determined, “these people who have high levels have had it since birth, and so they can get heart disease earlier,” says Erin Michos, a preventive cardiologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who was not involved with the clinical trial.
Now, a therapy that specifically targets lipoprotein(a) levels is on the horizon. In a clinical trial, the drug, which blocks the body’s ability to make the protein, reduced people’s levels of lipoprotein(a) by as much as 80 percent, researchers report in the Jan. 16 New England Journal of Medicine. The trial also found the drug to be safe.
Another clinical trial is now under way to determine whether drastically lowering levels of lipoprotein(a) in people who already have cardiovascular disease lessens their risk of heart attack and stroke (SN: 3/15/19).
Lipoprotein(a) is made up of a particle of LDL plus a protein called apolipoprotein(a). The relationship between LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease risk is well-established: When there is too much LDL cholesterol in the blood, it can get into the walls of arteries, stoking an inflammatory immune response that leads to thickened walls and narrowed arteries (SN: 5/3/17).
But LDL doesn’t appear to be the whole story, says cardiologist Michelle O’Donoghue of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, who was not part of the new study. “There are people who have very well-controlled LDL cholesterol levels who do go on to have heart attacks.” As a result, “there’s been a tremendous amount of interest in lipoprotein(a) and its possible role in progression of heart disease,” she says.
The LDL component is part of the reason that cardiovascular disease risk is higher with elevated levels of lipoprotein(a). But the apolipoprotein(a) component adds to the risk, says Sotirios Tsimikas, a cardiologist at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine in La Jolla. That protein appears to provoke a stronger inflammatory reaction than LDL does, hastening plaque development in artery walls. And apolipoprotein(a) has the potential to prevent blood clots from breaking up — bad news if an artery-blocking clot forms when a plaque ruptures.
“So in a way, it’s kind of a triple hit,” Tsimikas says. “You get all the bad things from LDL, but then you get two other things that are not good for you.”
To directly target the production of lipoprotein(a), Tsimikas and colleagues tested a drug called APO(a)-LRx, developed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals in Carlsbad, Calif., in a phase II clinical trial designed to determine the effectiveness and best dose of the treatment. The drug blocks the messenger RNA that provides genetic instructions to make the protein.
The researchers tested different drug doses in 286 patients with cardiovascular disease whose levels of lipoprotein(a) were at least 60 milligrams per deciliter of blood. Epidemiological data suggest that people with lipoprotein(a) levels between 50 and 100 mg/dL have a modest increase in the risk of cardiovascular problems, Tsimikas says. Those with levels above 100 mg/dL are at high risk. It’s estimated that about 20 percent of the population has lipoprotein(a) levels above 50 mg/dL, he says.  
At the highest dose of the drug, trial participants’ lipoprotein(a) levels dropped by an average of 80 percent by the end of the experiment.
To determine if the drug is effective at reducing the risk of heart attack and stroke, a phase III clinical trial, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals of Basel, Switzerland, has begun recruiting participants. Researchers will test the drug or a placebo over about four years in more than 7,500 people with cardiovascular disease and lipoprotein(a) levels of 70 mg/dL or higher.
If that trial is successful, further research will be needed to see if the drug also helps people with high levels of lipoprotein(a) avoid developing cardiovascular disease in the first place.

Saturday, August 03, 2019

Acupuncture for Angina

Key Points
Question  What is the efficacy and safety of acupuncture adjunctive therapy to antianginal therapies in reducing the frequency of angina attacks?
Findings  This randomized clinical trial that included 404 patients with chronic stable angina found that acupuncture on the acupoints in the disease-affected meridian significantly reduced the frequency of angina attacks compared with acupuncture on the acupoints on the nonaffected meridian, sham acupuncture, and no acupuncture.
Meaning  Adjunctive therapy with acupuncture had a significant effect in alleviating angina within 16 weeks.

Abstract
Importance  The effects of acupuncture as adjunctive treatment to antianginal therapies for patients with chronic stable angina are uncertain.
Objective  To investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture as adjunctive therapy to antianginal therapies in reducing frequency of angina attacks in patients with chronic stable angina.

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Percutaneous CoronaryInterventions

Recomendado pelo AMICOR Enrique Barros
Overuse of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
JAMA Intern Med. Published online January 16, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7828
Since Gruentzig first used a balloon to inflate the left anterior descending of a young man with angina in 1977, there have been hundreds of millions of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) done worldwide. Most PCI are performed on patients who are asymptomatic or who have not had a trial of optimal medical therapy,1 which is equally effective in preventing myocardial infarction or death. Furthermore, in symptomatic patients there is no benefit to PCI in reducing symptoms or improving quality of life compared with a placebo procedure.2 This carefully performed analysis3 from the China PEACE study adds to the concern of overuse of PCI. It documents yet another commonly known but little discussed contributor to inappropriate PCI—the inaccuracy of angiographic readings. Visual assessments tend to systematically overestimate the magnitude of the stenosis, meaning that patients will get an intervention on a lesion that is not hemodynamically significant. In a painstaking analysis of 1295 patients who underwent PCI in China, Zhang et al3 compared physician visual assessment with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). They found systematic overestimation of angiographic stenosis by 10% for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and 16% for patients without AMI./.../

Thursday, January 20, 2011

PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

CONSIDERABLE UNCERTAINTY REMAINS IN THE EVIDENCE FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE BY CARL HENEGHAN

  • By: Carl Heneghan
  • On: January 14, 2011, 15:39
thumbnail image: Considerable uncertainty remains in the evidence for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease by Carl Heneghan
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide,[1] and therefore strategies that aim to improve prevention in people without existing disease (primary prevention) are important for managing the overall burden of disease. This edition of The Cochrane Library adds to the evidence-base in this area with publication of two Cochrane Reviews on such preventive strategies: multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease,[2] and statins for the primary prevention of CVD.[3]
Multiple risk factor interventions aim to alter modifiable risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, high intake of dietary salt, lack of exercise, obesity and high glucose levels in people with diabetes, which increase the risk of coronary heart disease. The Cochrane Review by Ebrahim and colleagues focuses on counselling and educational interventions, and includes 55 trials (an addition of 16 studies compared with the previous version of this review) aimed at modifying one or more cardiovascular risk factors in the adult general population.[2]

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk

(Circulation. 2010;121:833-840.)


© 2010 American Heart Association, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AHA/ACS/AUA Science Advisory

Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk

A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and American Urological Association: Endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology

Glenn N. Levine, MD, FAHA, Chair; Anthony V. D'Amico, MD, PhD; Peter Berger, MD, FAHA; Peter E. Clark, MD; Robert H. Eckel, MD, FAHA; Nancy L. Keating, MD, MPH; Richard V. Milani, MD, FAHA; Arthur I. Sagalowsky, MD; Matthew R. Smith, MD, PhD; Neil Zakai, MD, on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Cancer Society, and the American Urological Association



Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements • cardiovascular risk • prostate cancer • androgen-deprivation therapy





An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.











Introduction



Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a widely used treatment for prostate cancer. Recently, several studies have reported an association between ADT and an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality.1–5 These reports have led to increased interest and discussion regarding the metabolic effects of ADT and its possible association with increased cardiovascular risk. In addition, likely as a result of these reports, internists, endocrinologists, and cardiologists are now being consulted regarding the evaluation and management of patients in whom ADT is being initiated. Most of these physicians are not aware of the possible effects of ADT on cardiovascular risk factors or the issues regarding ADT and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, this multidisciplinary writing group has been commissioned to review and summarize the metabolic effects of ADT, to evaluate the data regarding a possible relationship between ADT and cardiovascular events in patients with prostate cancer, and to generate suggestions regarding the evaluation and management of patients, both with and without known cardiac disease, in whom ADT is being initiated.

The writing group emphasizes that the purpose of this advisory is strictly informative. This advisory should thus not be construed as dictating clinical practice or superseding the clinical judgment of physicians, and it should not be used for medicolegal purposes./.../

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Economic Impact of Angina After an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Economic Impact of Angina After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From
the MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial
Suzanne V. Arnold, David A. Morrow, Yang Lei, David J. Cohen, Elizabeth M.
Mahoney, Eugene Braunwald, and Paul S. Chan
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes published 2 June 2009,
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.829523
http://circoutcomes.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.829523v1?papetoc

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Periodontitis and CHD: First evidence of a genetic link

Periodontitis and CHD: First evidence of a genetic link
June 1, 2009 | Lisa Nainggolan

Vienna, Austria - German scientists have for the first time identified a genetic link between periodontitis and coronary heart disease (CHD), two conditions characterized by a chronic inflammatory process [1]. Dr Arne Schaefer (Univeristy of Kiel, Germany) presented the findings of his study last week at the European Society of Human Genetics meeting.

He explained that an association between the dental disease and CHD has been known for many years, with evidence of an epidemiological relationship between the two, and many shared risk factors, such as smoking, diabetes, and obesity. But until now, a genetic link was suspected but not proven./.../

Friday, May 15, 2009

Joining Forces in Mortality and Longevity Conference


Plenary Speakers
Maria Azambuja
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Proponent, in 1994, of an association between the 1918 Influenza and the 20th Century CHD pandemics. Studying cohort effects of influenza priming upon longevity

A AMICOR Maria Inês foi convidada para participar da Conferência em Edinburgo.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Life-Course Socioeconomic Position and Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease

Appointed by Dr. Maria Ines Reinert Azambuja
The Framingham Offspring Study
Eric B. Loucks, John W. Lynch, Louise Pilote, Rebecca Fuhrer, Nisha D. Almeida, Hugues Richard, Golareh Agha, Joanne M. Murabito and Emelia J. Benjamin
Cumulative exposure to socioeconomic disadvantage across the life course may be inversely associated with coronary heart disease (CHD); the mechanisms are not fully clear. An objective of this study was to determine whether cumulative life-course socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with CHD incidence in a well-characterized US cohort that had directly assessed childhood and adulthood measures of SEP and prospectively measured CHD incidence. Furthermore, analyses aimed to evaluate whether adjustment for CHD risk factors reduces the association between cumulative life-course SEP and CHD. The authors examined 1,835 subjects who participated in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort from 1971 through 2003 (mean age, 35.0 years; 52.4% women). Childhood SEP was measured as father's education; adulthood SEP was assessed as own education and occupation. CHD incidence included myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency, and coronary death. Cox proportional hazards analyses indicated that cumulative SEP was associated with incident CHD after adjustment for age and sex (hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.17, 2.85 for low vs. high cumulative SEP score). Adjustment for CHD risk factors reduced that magnitude of association (hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.78, 2.13). These findings underscore the potential importance of CHD prevention and treatment efforts for those whose backgrounds include low SEP throughout life.

Thursday, January 08, 2009

Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT)

Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) 

ESC Press Committee's Journals' Digest

Topics: 

Diabetic heart disease

Date : 

07 Jan 2009
In this new "Journals' Digest" feature, Dr Marco Valgimigli of the ESC Press Committee will be providing on a monthly basis two articles of particular interest from a selection of influencial papers such as The New England Journal of Medicine. These will be posted via My ESC News and on the ESC Web Site.

Starting this month, a paper from The New England Journal of Medicine published December 17, 2008 (10.1056/NEJMoa0808431) entitled "Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes"

After the "Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation" (ADVANCE) trial and the "Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes" (ACCORD) trial, a third study, the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) reports no benefit of intensive glucose control over standard care in patients with Type 2 diabetes. 
...........................
Thus authors concluded that intensive glucose control in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes had no significant effect on the rates of major cardiovascular events, death or microvascular complications. /.../

Sunday, November 23, 2008

New anti-inflammatory compound promising in ACS

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
New anti-inflammatory compound promising in ACS
NOVEMBER 21, 2008 | Lisa Nainggolan

New Orleans, LA - A new anti-inflammatory compound, VIA-2291 (VIA Pharmaceuticals), has shown promise in a phase 2 trial in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and the results provide sufficient basis to move forward with additional studies, the lead investigator, Dr Jean-Claude Tardif(Montreal Heart Institute, QC) told heartwire. Tardif reported the phase 2 data at the American Heart Association (AHA) 2008 Scientific Sessions last week.

"We know that inflammation is a significant component, in both atherosclerosis initiation and progression and perhaps even in the events leading to ACS, so to test a drug that focuses on one of these proinflammatory pathways makes a lot of sense," Tardif commented. VIA-2291 is a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, and it demonstrated significant and dose-related inhibition of leukotrienes in the study, "so we know we are hitting the target, and that's good. There are a lot of data pointing to leukotrienes as a significant player," he added./.../

Saturday, October 25, 2008

A Study of Risk Factors for First Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries and Over 27,000 Subjects (INTERHEART)


Title: Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries: Results of the INTERHEART Study
Topic: General Cardiology
Date Posted: 10/20/2008
Author(s): Iqbal R, Anand S, Ounpuu S, et al., on behalf of the INTERHEART Study Investigators.
Citation: Circulation 2008;Oct 20:[Epub ahead of print].
Clinical Trial: No
Study Question: Diet is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but it varies markedly in different regions of the world. Is the association between dietary patterns and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) comparable globally?
Methods:  INTERHEART is a standardized case-control study involving participants from 52 countries designed to identify risk markers for AMI. The present analysis included 5,761 cases with AMI and 10,646 control subjects. Three major dietary patterns were identified using factor analysis: Oriental (high intake of tofu and soy and other sauces), Western (high in fried foods, salty snacks, eggs, and meat), and prudent (high in fruit and vegetables)./.../

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Management of Stable Coronary Disease — Polling Results

In late October, we presented the case of a patient with stable coronary artery disease in Clinical Decisions,1 an interactive feature designed to assess how readers would manage a clinical problem for which there may be more than one appropriate treatment. Our patient was a 65-year-old man with hypertension, obesity, and type 2 diabetes who presented with a 2-week history of exertional angina. He underwent an exercise-tolerance test on a treadmill, along with myocardial perfusion imaging, which showed a fixed anterior defect and a reversible anterolateral defect, both of moderate size. His subsequent cardiac catheterization revealed an occluded first diagonal branch, a long lesion with 70% stenosis in the midportion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, a calcified lesion with 80% stenosis in the proximal left circumflex coronary artery, and 50% stenosis of the posterior descending coronary artery. These findings were accompanied by anterior-wall hypokinesis and an ejection fraction of 45% by left ventriculography.
........
This is clearly a controversial area; more data on symptomatic but stable coronary artery disease are needed to direct clinical decisions. As we await such data, it appears that current approaches will continue to vary on the basis of an integration of physicians' experience and knowledge with patients' preferences. Given a clinical problem without a clear solution, many respondents appropriately noted the importance of discussing with the patient all treatment options and their possible outcomes.
Comments from this interactive feature will remain available at www.nejm.org, along with data on the voting results. We thank you for your input, and we look forward to hearing from you again soon about another challenging case.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Scanning the Genome for Coronary Risk

Anthony Rosenzweig, M.D.
Coronary artery disease remains an enormous clinical problem, affecting more than 15 million people in the United States alone, where it is the most common cause of death (accounting for one in three deaths).1 The prevalence of coronary heart disease is increasing at a particularly alarming rate in developing nations, which are ill equipped to shoulder the associated economic burden.2,3 The clinical need this represents underscores the importance of understanding the causes of coronary disease and identifying persons at risk.
Much progress has been made toward these goals. We now recognize many clinical risk factors — such as hyperlipidemia and diabetes — and realize that they can induce an inflammatory cascade marked by endothelial dysfunction, leukocyte recruitment, and proliferation of smooth-muscle cells, ultimately culminating in plaque formation.4 The addition of thrombosis, plaque rupture, or hemorrhage can lead to plaque instability and acute coronary syndromes. This suggests that risk factors could, in theory, affect primarily plaque formation or stability and in turn, measures of plaque burden (such as coronary calcification) or clinical events (such as myocardial infarction), respectively. However, most factors identified to date have qualitatively similar effects on both aspects of atherosclerosis