by Maria Popova
“Combinatory play seems to be the essential feature in productive thought.”

For as long as I can remember — and certainly long before I had the term for it — I’ve believed that creativity is combinatorial: Alive and awake to the world, we amass a collection of cross-disciplinary building blocks — knowledge, memories, bits of information, sparks of inspiration, and other existing ideas — that we then combine and recombine,
mostly unconsciously, into something “new.” From this vast and cross-disciplinary mental pool of resources beckons the infrastructure of what we call our
“own” “original” ideas. The notion, of course, is not new — some of history’s greatest minds across art, science, poetry, and cinema have articulated it, directly or indirectly, in one form or another:
Arthur Koestler’s famous
theory of “bisociation” explained creativity through the combination of elements that don’t ordinarily belong together; graphic designer
Paula Scher likens creativity to a slot machine that aligns the seemingly random jumble of stuff in our heads into a suddenly miraculous combination;
T. S. Eliot believed that the poet’s mind
incubates fragmentary thoughts into beautiful ideas; the great
Stephen Jay Gouldmaintained that
connecting the seemingly unconnected is the secret of genius;
Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press
embodied this combinatorial creativity; even
what we call “intuition” is based on the unconscious application of this very mental faculty./.../
No comments:
Post a Comment