This Blog AMICOR is a communication instrument of a group of friends primarily interested in health promotion, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases prevention.
To contact send a message to
John F. Nash Jr., a mathematician who shared a Nobel Prize in 1994 for work that greatly extended the reach and power of modern economic theory and whose long descent into severe mental illness and eventual recovery were the subject of a book and a film, both titled “A Beautiful Mind,” was killed, along with his wife, in a car crash on Saturday in New Jersey. He was 86.
Sgt. Gregory Williams of the New Jersey State Police said./.../
So goodbye John Nash, brilliant mathematician and beautiful mind, who has sadly just passed away after being involved in a taxi crash with his wife.
Nash was famous for many things, but was probably most well-known for being the subject of the biopicA Beautiful Mind - an Oscar-winning production that sugar-coated the details although mainly stayed true to spirit of Nash's remarkable story.
Nash won the Nobel prize for developing the Nash equilibrium which is the point in an ongoing interaction (the 'game' in 'game theory') where everyone has nothing to gain by changing their current strategy.
In Adam Curtis's documentary series The Trap, Curtis famously argues that Nash's ideas on game theory were taken up by the radical psychiatrist R.D. Laing who modelled the family as a self-interested struggle in game theory terms.
It's a neat idea - Laing's conflict-ridden model of the family were driven by the paranoid ideas of a man who became psychotic - but there's not much weight behind it.
Laing certainly did describe the family as conflict-ridden and used game theoretic ideas to describe these interactions, in his book Sanity, Madness and the Family, but Curtis seems to have been wrong about the influence of Nash.
Laing drew on Gregory Bateson's idea of a 'double bind' where two conflicting forms of communicated demand are placed on a family member which, according to Bateson, could lead to psychosis as people are forced to come up with an 'alternative reality' that satisfies the conflicting solicitations.
We now know this is wrong but it was influential at the time and set the scene for wider investigations into the role of family life and how it affects people with psychosis which proved genuinely useful.
But reading these theories, what is most surprising is how Nash's work isn't mentioned.
Bateson was in regular contact with game theory pioneers like Norbert Weiner and John von Neumann who would have clearly known about Nash's discoveries, but Nash is not referenced in either Bateson's or R.D. Laing's key works.
I find it unlikely that neither knew about John Nash, not least because he had published papers in verywellknownjournals.
It is possible, however, that neither knew about Nash's mental health, as Nash had begun to become unwell in 1959 and Sanity, Madness and the Family was published five years later, so it is possible that the news about Nash's psychosis had not filtered through.
But it is also possible that they were aware of what had happened to Nash, and opted to avoid his ideas precisely because he was thought to have become unwell.
Either way, it was a missed opportunity, because the idea of a Nash equilibrium makes perfect sense in terms of arriving at an unhelpful stalemate where no individual can seem to make a positive change - exactly what Laing was describing in families.
Fast forward 50 years, and Nash's ideas finally have begun to have an impact on the science of psychopathology. After A Beautiful Mind was released, based on Sylvia Nasar's earlier biography, studies emerged applying game theory and the Nash equilibrium to understanding the psychology and neuroscience of schizophrenia.
After revolutionising economics, social science and mathematics, Nash's ideas are starting to have an influence on the science of psychosis. A form of intellectual closure, perhaps, that Nash appreciated more than most.