A Policy Recommendation From the American Heart Association
Larry B. Goldstein, MD, FAHA, Chair; Laurie P. Whitsel, PhD; Neil Meltzer; Mark Schoeberl; Jill Birnbaum, JD; Sue Nelson; Timothy J. Gardner, MD, FAHA; Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FAHA; Raymond J. Gibbons, MD, FAHA; Ralph L. Sacco, MD, FAHA; Loren Hiratzka, MD, FAHA; on behalf of the American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative, and Resuscitation, Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and
Metabolism, and Interdisciplinary Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology
Excerpt:
If the AHA is to achieve its 2020 goals to reduce death and disability resulting from cardiovascular disease and stroke by 20% and to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20%, the association has to prioritize opportunities to address social inequities, issues specific to vulnerable populations (ethnic and racial minorities, those with low income or less education, children, blue collar workers), and the importance of removing barriers and obstacles for risk reduction and behavior change. Often the most disadvantaged members of the population have the greatest need for preventive screenings, health promotion, or programming and have the least access to or are the most reluctant to participate in these opportunities. The fundamental causes of vulnerability are rooted in issues of daily life, most often beyond the scope of
traditional public health, so it will be important for the AHA to consider engaging with nontraditional partners to consider ways to reduce health disparities in communities.
The following list is a summary of some of the specific ways AHA advocacy addresses issues around health disparities and vulnerable populations.
- Georg E Matt, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182-4611, USA; gmatt@sciences.sdsu.edu
Abstract
Background This study examined whether thirdhand smoke (THS) persists in smokers' homes after they move out and non-smokers move in, and whether new non-smoking residents are exposed to THS in these homes.
Methods The homes of 100 smokers and 50 non-smokers were visited before the residents moved out. Dust, surfaces, air and participants' fingers were measured for nicotine and children's urine samples were analysed for cotinine. The new residents who moved into these homes were recruited if they were non-smokers. Dust, surfaces, air and new residents' fingers were examined for nicotine in 25 former smoker and 16 former non-smoker homes. A urine sample was collected from the youngest resident.
Results Smoker homes' dust, surface and air nicotine levels decreased after the change of occupancy (p<0.001); however dust and surfaces showed higher contamination levels in former smoker homes than former non-smoker homes (p<0.05). Non-smoking participants' finger nicotine was higher in former smoker homes compared to former non-smoker homes (p<0.05). Finger nicotine levels among non-smokers living in former smoker homes were significantly correlated with dust and surface nicotine and urine cotinine.
Conclusions These findings indicate that THS accumulates in smokers' homes and persists when smokers move out even after homes remain vacant for 2 months and are cleaned and prepared for new residents. When non-smokers move into homes formerly occupied by smokers, they encounter indoor environments with THS polluted surfaces and dust. Results suggest that non-smokers living in former smoker homes are exposed to THS in dust and on surfaces.